Review



erk1 2 sirna  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology erk1 2 sirna
    Erk1 2 Sirna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 111 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/erk1 2 sirna/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 111 article reviews
    erk1 2 sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p44/p42 (erk1/2) map kinase sirna
    P44/P42 (Erk1/2) Map Kinase Sirna, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p44/p42 (erk1/2) map kinase sirna/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    p44/p42 (erk1/2) map kinase sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Samchully Pharm Co Ltd erk1 sirna
    Erk1 Sirna, supplied by Samchully Pharm Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/erk1 sirna/product/Samchully Pharm Co Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    erk1 sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc sirna against erk1 2
    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting <t>ERK1/2</t> or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.
    Sirna Against Erk1 2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sirna against erk1 2/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sirna against erk1 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Ribobio co sirna for erk1/2 sig150819100854-1-5
    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting <t>ERK1/2</t> or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.
    Sirna For Erk1/2 Sig150819100854 1 5, supplied by Ribobio co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sirna for erk1/2 sig150819100854-1-5/product/Ribobio co
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sirna for erk1/2 sig150819100854-1-5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher sirnas targeting p38 mapk, erk1/2 golgin-97
    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting <t>ERK1/2</t> or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.
    Sirnas Targeting P38 Mapk, Erk1/2 Golgin 97, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sirnas targeting p38 mapk, erk1/2 golgin-97/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sirnas targeting p38 mapk, erk1/2 golgin-97 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc erk1/2 sirna
    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting <t>ERK1/2</t> or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.
    Erk1/2 Sirna, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/erk1/2 sirna/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    erk1/2 sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Shanghai GenePharma sirnas targeting lmp1, aqp3 and erk1/2
    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting <t>ERK1/2</t> or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.
    Sirnas Targeting Lmp1, Aqp3 And Erk1/2, supplied by Shanghai GenePharma, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sirnas targeting lmp1, aqp3 and erk1/2/product/Shanghai GenePharma
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sirnas targeting lmp1, aqp3 and erk1/2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc erk1 2 sirna
    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting <t>ERK1/2</t> or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.
    Erk1 2 Sirna, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/erk1 2 sirna/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    erk1 2 sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology erk1 2 sirna
    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting <t>ERK1/2</t> or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.
    Erk1 2 Sirna, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/erk1 2 sirna/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    erk1 2 sirna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: ERK plays a conserved dominant role in pancreas cancer cell EMT heterogeneity driven by diverse growth factors and chemotherapies

    doi: 10.1101/2025.02.08.637251

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs targeting ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL HGF + 10ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. A ) Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun for the indicated conditions. Images representative of n = 3. B) and C) Bar plots displaying fraction of cells in “pc-Jun high” or “pERK high” signaling bins for the indicated conditions. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. D) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 24 hr. Representative 4i images of pERK and pc-Jun are shown, n = 3. E) and F) For the experiment described in (D), pERK or pc-Jun signal intensity is displayed. n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. G) HPAF-II cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNAs for the knockdown of ERK1/2 or c-Jun for 24 hr and then treated with 50 ng/mL EGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ or 50 ng/mL HGF + 10 ng/mL TGFβ for 48 hr. Representative 4i images of indicated proteins across treatment and siRNA conditions at 48 hr, n = 3. H) For the experiment described in (G), the mosaic plot displays percentages of cells in each EMT phenotype bin. n = 3, Chi-squared test. I) For the experiment described in (G), representative 4i images of total ERK are shown, n = 3 . J) For the experiment described in (G), the net percent reduction in uncertainty of the EMT phenotype based on pERK, pc-Jun, or both signals is plotted. n=3, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. For all panels *p < 0.05, and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Scale bars indicate 300 μm.

    Article Snippet: Cells were plated on top of the siRNA-lipid complexes 24 hr prior to treatment and fixed for immunofluorescence staining 72 hr post-transfection. siRNA against ERK1/2 (#6560) was purchased from Cell Signal Technology. c-Jun (sc-29223) and control siRNA (sc-37007) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

    Techniques: Transfection, Control, Knockdown